D. JonesApple Vs Adobe Part 2: Steve Jobs Responds!
April 13th 2010 08:07
Steve Jobs has weighed in on Apple’s new rule that iPhone and iPad applications must be “originally written” in C/C /Objective-C, a mandate that’s being seen as another sleight against Adobe Flash (Not necessarily!) The response comes after an Adobe employee wrote a post telling Apple to, “Go screw yourself!“ (See earlier post for details!)
Developer Greg Slepak CLAIMS to have emailed the Apple CEO about the situation, and posted the following response. Given that Steve does randomly reply to emails (with characteristically curt responses), we’re going to assume the following email is legit: (I will not add my comments to the emails!)
Hi Steve,
Lots of people are pissed off at Apple’s mandate that applications be “originally written” in C/C /Objective-C. If you go, for example, to the Hacker News (Hacker News) homepage right now, you’ll see that most of the front page stories about this new restriction, with #1 being: “Steve Jobs Has Just Gone Mad” with (currently) 243 upvotes. The top 5 stories are all negative reactions to the TOS, and there are several others below them as well. Not a single positive reaction, even from John Gruber, your biggest fan. I love your product, but your SDK TOS are growing on it like an invisible cancer.
Sincerely,
Greg
Steve's response:
We think John Gruber’s post is very insightful and not negative.
Steve
Greg responds:
Sorry. I didn’t catch that post, but I finished it just now.
I still think it undermines Apple. You didn’t need this clause to get to where you are now with the iPhone’s market share, adding it just makes people lose respect for you and run for the hills, as a commenter to that article stated:
“So what Apple does not want is for some other company to establish a de facto standard software platform on top of Cocoa Touch. Not Adobe’s Flash. Not .NET (through MonoTouch). If that were to happen, there’s no lock-in advantage.” And that makes Apple evil. At least, it does in the sense that Google (Google) uses the term in “don’t be evil” – I believe pg translated “evil” as something along the lines of “trying to compete by means other than making the best product and marketing it honestly”. From a developer’s point of view, you’re limiting creativity itself. Gruber is wrong, there are plenty of [applications] written using cross-platform frameworks that are amazing, that he himself has praised. Mozilla’s Firefox (Firefox) just being one of them.
I don’t think Apple has much to gain with 3.3.1, quite the opposite actually.
Sincerely,
Greg
Steve responds:
We’ve been there before, and intermediate layers between the platform and the developer ultimately produces sub-standard apps and hinders the progress of the platform.
There you have it! These are emails (hopefully legitimate!) from a developer and Steven Jobs. The fact that Jobs has defended Apple’s position is no surprise! But what else could he do? Come out and say the he doesn't like Adobe and that they make an inferior product? His response will almost certainly up the ante in this battle of the software titans. (Or is it "Clash of the Titans?")
What do YOU think of Steve’s reply? Does he make a legitimate point or not?
| 130 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog
